i read this article and found this :
The president laid out circumstances in which war is justified — in self-defense, to come to the aid of an invaded nation, on humanitarian grounds such as when civilians are slaughtered by their own government.
so why are there still U.S troops in Afghanistan?
it’s NOT for self-defense, NOT to come to the aid of an invaded nation, and definitely NOT on humanitarian grounds.
can somebody please tell me why he won the Nobel PEACE Prize ?
No matter how you try to justify a war on a country that you are not part of on a land that you do not own, haven’t your invasion jeopardized a nation’s search for peace?
Let us reach for the world that ought to be
We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace
or so you say.
you’re saying it like it means something.
although perhaps thousands more will pay for the price of your idea of peace.
waging wars at the palm of your hands
..when this is not even your last resort.
isn’t it ironic how a Nobel Peace Prize winner would justify the war as an idea of achieving peace.
of course wars are waged throughout the history of mankind, but to know that you have the power to stop it and to choose NOT to
..well isn’t that something.